Видео

Mining atoms....

Our government is convinced that the public as a whole is stupid. Evidence shows it is all about breaking down the USA economy.

Always great to see you Robert. Do miss the podcast! Cheers 🥃🥃

It's an energy *_addition,_* Robert. Fossil-fuels are being *_added._* Hydro is being *_added._* Uranium is being *_added._*

The people who think the Hydrocarbon Genie can be stuffed back into his bottle are supremely delusional.

bring back the podcast

There is an energy transition, it will just take 100 years.

thanks

Total nonsense. Look at Europe and Asia.

The EPA, for oh so long, hasn't cared.

No natural gas won't stay cheap.

16:30 Yes. It's rare people can hold their own evil consciously.

We know how to successfully transition away from fossil fuels as they become more scarce and expensive, we simply choose not to. We just haven't exhausted all the stupid ways yet.

Nothing stays cheap once their is a demand. Thanks for your work Robert.

The answer is that the busy bodies ought to leave people alone!

Bjorn Lomborg said recently that the US could go NetZero tomorrow and it would have almost no impact on Co2 levels because of China and India. Why is Joe Biden destroying our economy for no benefit to us or the planet?

Enjoy your time near Lake Erie and NY wine country. Evangola State Park is about 20 miles away. Lovely place on the lake for a picnic

The answer is trains.

But you need to factor in how many people are on the plane vs how many are in the car.

ok

Mr. Machogu is right about climate change; it's a lie by the globalists, an excuse to build a worldwide dictatorship and recolonize countries, Africa should reject the idea. BBC paints Machogu as an ignorant person, but his claims are supported by some honest members of the scientific community

american tree huggers and EPA need to fuk off

If I was an oil executive I would be goofy with delight over the facts in your discussion. Just lie that it’s a ‘green solution’ and move on to count the $. On an interesting side note Doug Ford the Premier of the Ontario Canada provincial government quietly permitted the main natural ( methane) gas supplier in Ontario, Enbridge, the permission to add 10% H2 gas to the pipeline supply of gas to households. Numerous materials experts sounded the alarm about leakage and embrittlement of the existing pipes due to hydrogen. Guess who got ignored.

Great. Your Content is fantastic, But your video optimization section area is not perfectly up to date. Out of 100 that’s score 0, That’s why your video is not reaching out to people, and you have very few subscribers, views , likes, watch time and comments. I think your RUclips channel will make your dream come true. Can I talk with you?

i do consider some points in his views **without** wanting to be called a promoter of conspicary. One thing is practically a fact on all continents : we all rely on fossil fuels, if we like it or not. Measurements to try to lower the dependencies on fossil fuels are welcome e.g. if they really can be replaced or at least complimented by with let's say nuclear power, but so called "renawable" sources like wind- and solar-power will never ever meet the demand. There is indeed one big problem with the climate-chance-disgussion: IT IS OVER EXACORATED. And over-simplified and i do not believe that there is a general consensus on such a simplified view. The simplified vie is: human beings burn things, these things release CO2 (which is an end oxidant product of the vast majority of burning and breathing reactions) and this co2 heats the atmosphere and destroys the planet?? There are so many things being ignored here. co2 is as we all should know still a very faint gas in our air with 0,03 something percent of weight/volume. There are soooo many factors contributing to the climate including many "natural" processes that release co2. This equation "human industry = planet destruction" really is too simple and there are scientists (even ones that won a nobel prize) who do strongly contradict this view but they are seldomly heard. We talk of a climate "crisis" but where is the crisis?? We ignore that there have been so many catastrophic climate/weather phenomenos in the far but also in the recent past. The climate-debate is indeed highly POLITICAL and not very scientific and i find it UNFORTUNATE that everyone who slightly contradicts this narrativ or puts it into question is regarded as a conspiracy-maker. Progably i would not agree with Jusper Machogu that the climate debate was made to keep Africa poor. This too is too simple! BUT something got out of hand in the last 40 years or so that turned the climate debate qhite into EXTREMISM. Take the example of Greta Thunberg talking infront of the high UN commission. To me this is an act of extremism. "how dare you?" ... how dare what? How dare that we created a civilization and put many people into prosperity? This was so madeup and staged and many journalists and politicians simply accepted it. i do apreciate that the climate discussion would become less fanatic, more realistic and more scientific. i do not believe that people who promote the climate apocalypsis over and over again really want a better world for all. many environmentalists are in reality anti-prosperity, anti-civilisation, anti-modernism, anti-cars, anti-this anti-that anti-airplains..... it has indeed come to a point where it is off-rail. Sure, why in the long term, should Africa not exploit natural resources? Especially methane / "natural gas" and also when it comes to oil, modern ways of burning it (especially Diesel engines which are still not fully developed) have a huge potential with meanwhil relatively clean exhaust gasses (and i am not only talking about small car vehicles); we will still be dependant on what we call fossil fules --- although even this term might need overhaup as we don't exactly know iff all oil/gas resources are really "fossil": we don't know how many carbo-hydrate-compounds e.g. came to Earth from Asteroids. Today everything is about narrativ and political ideology. It is for sure that we will long depend on these fules and "zero carbon emmission" is a dream. So why not also let the African continent participate, diversify exploitation of fuels so we's be less dependant e.g. on Russia or the Arab countries? Yes i do see some truth in Jusper Machogus vies, though it all is much complexer. and i would apreciate a more colorful discussion --- this in long term really might make the world better and less fanatic...

Good information. Please provide the charts or graphics.

Interesting video.

Trump was right! China Joe.

This is kind of silly. EV infrastructure is being built out in anticipation of more EV cars on the road in upcoming years. As more EVs are sold, the more you will see EV's being charged. Instead of doing anti-EV rants, I would suggest explaining this from the "chicken and egg" perspective. Which one came first? I live near a gas station. I just drove by, and all of the pumps were empty. Nobody was using them! That must be proof that ICE cars are in decline. (joking of course)

Robert's long form RUclips commentary is missed.

...because EV's suck...

Peter the deep state conman

There is nothing wrong with electric vehicles or American innovation or know how. There is a monumental problem with Joe Biden never having a real job or having to manage his way through anything.

I just stumbled on this. I live in Michigan. Approximately a year ago they put in seven charging stations at a new big box store. I have been their 4 times in the last several months. The charging stations are Tesla. I pay attention because it also interests me as to what's going on. Never has there been a vehicle plugged in at any of these stations. It looks like they are just there to rot.

1:19 1:24 No, Robert. There aren't *_150_* pumps at *_any_* Buc-ee's. The Buc-ee's in Katy, TX has *_120_* pumps. The Buc-ee's in Temple, TX has *_110_* pumps.

What is your recommendation for additional, weather resistant, power generation?

Why is it that some people don't want others to drive electric, its not his money being wasted as he says. If they were all full he would be saying this technology does not work because there are not enough chargers. Live and let live, stop hating.

only an idiot buys a ev

Robert I started following you a few weeks ago because I’m interested in the energy space. Honestly, I have yet to figure out what your message is. The current programs may not be well thought out, but what should we be doing instead ? I take it you’re not wild about EVs. I dunno, man. I’ve owned over 30 cars. I leased a Tesla Model 3 last year just to see what life with an EV was really like. It costs me about $40 a month in electricity to drive it vs. $250 in gas for my Audi. It is painless to live with. I still have the Audi and drive it about once a week. Every time I do, I ask myself why the hell do I still own this thing? I may not get another Tesla, but I will definitely have another EV as my daily driver. I charge at home and I do believe it’s a much harder case to make if you are reliant on public charging. As they say…your mileage may vary.

I agree with and appreciate the "energy realism" you present. It's just that you seem to be almost gleeful that climate change is proving to be so hard to counteract.

Hydrogen fuel cells are a proven technology used in the U.S. space program since the 1960s. The disadvantages, as you mentioned, are the expense and volatility of hydrogen. Hydrogen could be produced cheaper using solar power. The advantage of hydrogen as a fuel is that burning it only produces water as a byproduct.

Appreciate everything you do Robert! Cheers 🥃🥃

great work robert

The EPA should not this power.

What mine is he referring to? I could find no information. Silicon is abundant.

Jesus, Robert. Enough with the short format videos. Your viewership is smarter than that and can handle some long format videos. This isn't TikTok. TikTok viewers don't have the brains to bother listening to you.

Hydrogen does occur naturally...just not around here

Glad to see another Smilophyte continuing to spout energy sense ... Grand Transitions and Harvesting the Biosphere are 2 of my favs. His work should be the foundation of addressing energy issues in the 21st century at the risk of creating natural collapses other wise if not adhered to ... 10-20-30 yrs down the road. Energy Myths and Reality needs an update ...

Net-Zero is not bullsh*t, it's the foundation of the largest transfer of wealth scam in human history and it was never meant to be achieved.

Of course, EV'S are not new either. Both them and their shortcomings were well explored during the 1910's/20's. They lost favor for the same reasons they're tanking, no pun intended, now. They were marketed as clean, easy to operate automobiles for suburban women. The issues were cost related as electricity back then was substantially more expensive than today. Only the rich could afford to operate one. The rapid pace of advancements in the gasoline powered cars meant the window of opportunity closed rather quickly. Detroit has been pushing relatively hard since the late 90's to advance the hydrogen platform. The best stort-term answer is higher octane fuel, which allows higher compression. We could virtually cut in half fuel consumption over a short period of time if we went that direction. The issue is the side effects of that are added chemicals to the fuel to increase knock resistance aren't environmentally friendly. We are stuck, for the time being with a petroleum powered economy.